must be taken into account the dunghill that the "Arab revolution" are leaving. Manure for some reason to hope for others. In Bahrain we
silence by the drift of events. The crushing of the movement with Saudi help, and the silence of the media. What happens in Bahrain newspaper claims against all logic. Http://rompiendo-muros.blogspot.com/2011/05/hokok-en-la-haya-crimenes-en-bahrein-y.html
Of course we have the Tunisian cuestioens where the puppet regime imposed makeover fails to convince the people on the street. 'We have won the revolution' is a rallying cry to the media blackout. In fact, the revolution has never been his. Stirred the masses mainly through the radio. (And no twitter.) It was left to do in an environment of economic decline but things remain the same or worse. The day after the friendly regime change was dedicated police beat to leave the Tunisian Qasba. Afortunademente in Rebelión have understood the importance of following what is happening there, the real revolution http://rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=128355
Mubarak in Egypt was changed to Suleiman and the military. (Mubarak was also general). Another change of face. Changing economic elites at the pace of neoliberal change the past decade. But the movement remains Tahir Square. What there are journalists. No longer interested. The behavior of the media is actually showing they serve, but doing so leaving them naked.
Returning to the main theme in this blog are interested, the Libyan case. Libya is very interesting and goes back even more. The top-level summit on China-Russia St. Petersburg in mid-June may delineate the lines of action and perhaps coordinate top-level diplomatic counteroffensive. Naturally, as I outlined earlier contacts pose. And therefore we are in a hurry.
The rush is on the side bildelberguista Atlantic. In Clinton's stupid and genocidal Amazon does not seem to like to contradict him, 'Come Gaddafi, go bother us. " But Qaddafi is not leaving.
The front is rough. The first decision to use money from the Libyan sovereign funds held by the West to 'pay' to the rebels. No wonder they are already doing accounts. $ 750 million is the first approximation of costs for Americans. If so, the war they are going very cheap they can win. The side not matter and in the side there are the soldiers of the NATO multinational fight for the interests of money. Another side of course, is lying and manipulating information.
Regarding the case of money returned by such interest the article by Ria Novosti. Http://sp.rian.ru/opinion_analysis/20110512/148967405.html In a popular term but it's pretty clear considering that Ria is semiofficial bodies.
On the media front little to say. Gaddafi out on TV and just hours after NATO bombed a television studio where the subject may be broadcasted. And of course the media or mu. NATO continues to bomb Tripoli and his campaign for the destruction of infrastructure is booming. It is assumed that the more destruction more reconstruction contractors may make American or Western. With the money from the Libyans clear. Contractors, arms deals, SWFs ... speaking of oil (only). The agricultural issue is a topic that does not speak much. But I have seen and another subject more interesting. The speculation that Gaddafi would stop selling its oil in dollars. And that is taboo. It is a cruise missile against the waterline of the western economy. You play the Chicago derivatives business, the economy slips and cast doubt on the dollar at a crucial time. So much for the body, Gaddafi has passed.
On the diplomatic front there are two fronts and other suterraneos. The theme of the National Transition Council which gradually begins to recognize their 'official' http://sp.rian.ru/international/20110514/148987385.html The only problem is that it is composed of people of NSFL formed not For too many years in USA. In addition to people from the CIA and a mixture of old gadafistas responsible for many of the things you attribute to the colonel.
Based on this official can download the money withheld. For now it is a thorny issue but it can bring many future problems. In fact the possibility of partition of the country. The Somalization is another theory that turns on the network.
And now the funniest of all, the so-called contact group. We can see that the Russians really think http://sp.rian.ru/international/20110513/148974178.html In principle, the Russian foreign minister's claims on TV talking about the known plans of NATO to carry out land operation. Found that Libya is not Serbia and infrastructure would destroy the oil and communications are much isolate the enemy as to preclude any progress. So Libya is not Serbia.
The growing opposition of Russia and China also has to do with the diplomatic efforts intervention in Syria. The Syrian case has been a good response. Syria is also using the same media arms: exaggerated, unconfirmed, use of NGOs as stakeholders platform for reporting, use of local mafias to start riots with murder ... The issue of killing of demonstrators by the angels of NATO is known. As for that girl in a demonstration in Tehran was hit by a terrorist sniper-American. There is no doubt and this is the first rule to understand. In Libya, he wanted to advance through the back door. Attack to find relief from the mercenary scoundrel Ban Ki Moon a pass defend humanitarian aid. Is that why Qaddafi has withdrawn from Misrata? We'll see as the story ends but the terrorists of NATO in a hurry.
0 comments:
Post a Comment