if not Article 6 or 20 of the Constitution which states that the English have a right to accurate information. Obviously no government in the 35 years of democracy has been dedicated to developing civil code and laws that may limit a criminal and his punishment lies in mass media. Do not interest.
And meanwhile, we see how the media lie outright. Or rather, as it is handled.
The last operation is certainly brazen, almost, almost as if they were laughing in the face. Apparently they treat us like children and like idiots. Since then the tone of many of the news and the tone of the same child for many years to prove it. But the facts are more concrete.
information and facts are concrete. Things happen in Syria and has been a vote of condemnation or attempted condemnation of the Syrian regime by the UN as we put in the previous post. It turns out that both Russia and China voted a resounding NO imposing veto. I know the machinery that can be followed in the UN. I believe the General Assembly may also impose any sentence but this requires a plenary session. What is normal and usual in a hurry is often used by the Security Council of 15 members and in fact is what makes the lead in such matters as you see, are a law having regard to the resolutions on Libya.
However, English media are getting tired of repeating over and over again that the conviction is all but stalled. That the UN did not come to an agreement to condemn Syria. Of course without mentioning the fact that there have been resolutions in condemnation and has been a NO. The diplomatic game feeds the bait information handling as the negative given the sentence is trying to pass a resolution statement. A statement just express what you think the international community (in fact the 15 who sit at the table.) But it goes much further. However, this allows maipulación mass media cling to the idea that 'the UN can not reach an agreement. " Crushing and reinforcing the message at a time to condemn done through drama, exaggeration, concealment of facts (like the attack on military convoys or death and humiliation of police), dissemination of information without contrast (especially the famous' NGOs humanitarian '). In short, strengthening a message is missing the key, the real international condemnation of the UN. It is therefore not unbiased and more than that you lie and manipulate.
Why justice is not involved in something so blatant? A Well, I forgot that this country is not a rule of law.
0 comments:
Post a Comment