really could be more interesting to see how it develops the failed revolution in Tunisia. Or even in Egypt. But the Libyan issue has a special interest in terms of all the implications that you are taking.
The theme of the rebel bombardment by NATO, collateral damage appears to be undesirable, is still a matter of information and misinformation. In the bombing does not seem to agree on how many deaths have occurred, and that the agencies and journalists are all on the front band. The funny thing is seeing is trying, if not disinformation, if put in doubt the issue of the bombing. The version that are really who bombed government Libyan or as I like to call them now 'by gadafistas'.
This is just a smoke screen between the statements 'official' of the rebels. But lets see how it handles the misinformation. NATO actually cares very little 'collateral' such as in Afghanistan that if we take the same yardstick should be the subject of resolutions against war crimes of NATO day in and day out. But the interesting thing here is to sow doubt. The question is created when newspaper articles appear contradictory and do not take into account the variety in the source. This is what happens when you enter the Twitter as a source of information. And thus creates some doubt the reader owners not interested in that course can keep what you like. The commercialization of information when in fact the truth should be almost unique. But no matter for those who say they report.
The other interesting point that I find interesting is that yesterday reported progress Ria by government troops against rebels taking Ajdabiya, and appears not matched in a battle but rather a collapse of the rebel front. If so, the rebels have nothing to Bengazzi and the road to Tobruk, terminal they are using to export the oil rebels could be open. But that was not reported.
Another issue that I find it curious is the brief note that appears in AlJazeera on his blog today 8, in which verbatim reports: 2:18 a.m.
On Thursday, Abdel Fattah Younes, the defected head of the rebel military, confirm for the first Time That Have Received the Opposition forces Foreign weapons: anti-tank guns from Qatar. But the tiny Gulf country has-been wealthy at the Forefront of Libya's support for anti-Gaddafi Movement, Offering Them Official Recognition and To Be a broker for Their oil.
The emir of Qatar in this war is having an activity certainly curious. Including the handling capacity he has shown throughout the AlJazeera conflict.
Qatar, which is being used as a broker in the case of export of oil from the 'rebels' will become an arms dealer also in violation of UN resolutions, the embargo. Something that the emirs of the Gulf autocrats will not be imported. To which we must try to find out who is behind the riots in Bahrain because it is clear that the Saudi-US pact to crush the opposition means many things.
Chances are that someone not interested in regime change but maintain a constant instability in the area. As oil prices rise, gold, the commodities ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment