and friend of Aznar. Libya
These days misinformation about content Libya has a tremendous, the cluster bombs.
What I know is that these are bombs that are dropped from planes, which become multi-explosive bombs that create a kind of rain of explosives of great dispersal, many of which do not exploit the first and end up accumulate on the floor sleeping bombs. The ability to do harm from unprotected targets, that is, for example civil, is very high.
Contrary to what is said cluster bombs are forbidden only by those countries that have signed an agreement, unless for example USA, a country signer. In fact the U.S. used cluster bombs in Kosovo (as well as Russia in Chechnya) and recently in Afghanistan.
When it comes to cluster bombs comes to mind planes dropping bombs, when what is involved in the alleged weapon is HRW denounced by a mortar shell of 120 mm. or something. Yes, we are talking about material that is dispersed and therefore creates a shrapnel pretty wild and inhuman. But within prespective what is a mortar and the use of such weapons is prohibited as we really want to see.
Moreover it seems that the processing of information would be intended to underline precisely the bombing and the bombing of civilians, which itself is punished or branded as a war crime. When in fact it is assumed that NATO requires that any Libyan aircraft could fly, much less bomb. But that does not matter to see what is not what has been. What is important in the propaganda and misinformation is the impression left by the emotional grounds remember calling. No matter how many times if it is a lie as long as, when assemble belies not too mess to remove the first memory captured. This is called manipulation.
There is an issue on the English origin of the explosive which is certainly interesting, you have searched for the genocidal Hillary between the documentation of arms purchases Libya to see what was what could be considered 'illegal' or 'criminal' and only found English this ammunition? It's more than possible that in the propaganda war anything goes. In another aspect
Grad rockets have struck me for granted Get interested. That these rockets were used in attacking Saakashvili Tsinvali in the early hours of the war in Ossetia. Something that was imprinted on youtube and yet Sarkozy insisted the first time to see it was the opposite. No matter, the use of Grad think it is good if you use Saakashvili and bad if you use the Libyan government, especially taking into account that he used indiscriminately Saakashvili population civil. In this case it seems to try to convince us of the same.
And now back to the amazing words of Aznar. More or less that Gaddafi is a friend, but friend extrafalario and does not understand why he was attacked. You can do many interpretations since the bad type of the pin until fine Aznar instinct is telling an interesting direction. Is realizing that this war is still unpopular? Is away from the official version in order to safeguard a possible storm given the public and that the conflict is cystic and is getting very strange things as participation and even Hetzbollah Alcaedos?. Or is it also try to look to Syria and Iran and not lose sight? In any case, something that goes from the script and therefore interesting.
0 comments:
Post a Comment